Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Kimi K2.6

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Kimi K2.6: which AI model is cheaper, has the larger context window and more capabilities? Side-by-side comparison updated daily.

Quick verdict

  • Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is 11× cheaper than Kimi K2.6 for the same mix of input and output tokens.
  • Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor has the larger context window (1M), useful for long documents and big codebases.
  • Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is the more recent release (Sep 2, 2026).
  • Only Kimi K2.6 has openly published weights you can run yourself.
  • Choose Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor if cost matters most; choose Kimi K2.6 if you need its specific strengths above. For the best results, test both on your own prompts.
Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorKimi K2.6
CompanyMetaMoonshot AI
ReleasedSep 2, 2026 ●Apr 20, 2026
Overall index—151.0
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
GPQA Diamond—90.8%
AIME math—96.1%
FrontierMath—57.2%
SimpleQA Verified—34.9%
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10 ●$0.65
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.20 ●$3.41
Cost for 1M input + 1M output tokens$0.30 ●$4.06
Providers118 ●
Context1M ●256K
Max output944K ●236K
InputsText, Image, Video, Files ●Text, Image
OutputsTextText
Reasoning✓✓
Tool use✓✓
Structured output✓✓
Open weights—✓

Add a model →

Popular comparisons